US rates – who decides?
Daily update
Daily update
- Yesterday, US President Trump sought to fire the two Democrat commissioners on the Federal Trade Commission. If successful, this might become a precedent that could challenge the political independence of the Federal Reserve. If the president can dismiss Fed members, only the Senate confirmation process will serve as a check on politicization. Markets may not view that as robust. A political Federal Reserve risks weakening the US dollar’s reserve status.
- For now, the Fed is independent, and is expected to leave rates unchanged today. Fed forecasts are also due, but the erratic policy climate creates considerable uncertainty about the economic outlook. On tariffs alone there is uncertainty about the breadth and scale of taxes, second-round effects, consumer reactions, and retaliation.
- Eurozone final February consumer price inflation is a non-event as the numbers almost never change. There are a few ECB speakers scheduled, with markets firm in their expectation of additional rate cuts. The Bank of Japan left rates unchanged and highlighted trade risks to the outlook—hardly surprising.
- Trump failed to get a comprehensive ceasefire in Ukraine, in a call with Russian President Putin. Europe seems to have limited faith in the direction of the negotiations, with the UK and the EU talking about accelerating arms shipments to Ukraine.
Explore more CIO Daily Updates
- How quickly will US inflation increase?
- ….not well
- ±….
- Economists’ ignorance is the problem
- United fronts
- “End the Fed”?
- US inflation pain a global gain?
- State controlled prices
- Tax facts
- Who believes the numbers?
- Insecurity
- Fiscal inefficiency
- Animal spirits measurement
- Tariffs start to show up
- Sort of stagflation?
- Changing the growth narrative
- A tale of two consumers
- Regional variations
- The rising price of drowning sorrows
- Cutting confidence more than spending
- Powell is not a chicken farmer
- When economics takes over
- Deflation and inflation
- Tax and retreat
- Taxes, spending, and rate cuts
- A disturbance in the force
- Tax attacks
- Taxes and data tampering
- Durable inflation?
- Markets start to fret
- US President Trump’s confusion
- Panem or Panglossian?
- Is an avocado tax credible?
- Breaking with the past
- Time to invest in the US?
- The risk of fantastic savings
- Nervousness about policy
- More taxes ahead
- Hiring and firing
- Keeping trade in the spotlight
- What US retreats tell us
- Protectionist, or pushover?
- The damage of data dependency
- The wider politics of price rises
- Time to plead for exceptions?
- What tariff retreats teach us
- The fear of fear
- Revising history
- Right person, right job, right time
- Trivialities and perceptions
- Retreat repeat
- The Phantom Menace?
- Another fun year
- Time for more taxes
- Policy and policy uncertainty
- Rates and spending
- Efficiency versus GDP
- Reassuring signals?
- Tariff tales
- Setting rates
- Tariffs may not “solve” everything
- Threats and freezes
- Scripted versus unscripted
- Competitiveness considerations
- Will dollar strength magic away tariffs?
- Trade taxes and the US Treasury
- Benign inflation; now, what about growth?
- Shell shocked?
- Trade taxes and boiling frogs
- Buy before prices rise
- Does deregulation always boost growth?
- Dullness, and bias
- Ninety one days
- US rates paths
- Guardrails
- Taxes or tips?
- Laboring a point
- Here we go again
- A year of upsetting everyone
- Solid foundations, political threats
- Rates: Same story, different risks
- The end of the rate cut scramble
- Political noise, again
- Shuffling demand around
- Can food prices fall?
- Supporting consumers
- Real talk
- Taxing US consumers, cutting China’s taxes
- Taxing via tariffs
- The other side of the coin
- Employment without consensus
- Barnier falls
- Rule of law
- Après moi, le déluge?
- The importance of being the dollar
- Supply and demand, and inflation
- Budgets and bonds
- The good life
- Rate cuts and tax hikes
- Orthodoxy does not have influence