The Phantom Menace?
Daily update
Daily update
- Economists are geeks. Star Wars parallels are tempting: US President Trump as the Trade Federation leader; Trump’s largest donor Musk as Chancellor Palpatine, railing against bureaucrats; and economists as Jedi Knights. But threatened US trade taxes have real consequences. Investors’ hope is the precedent of Trump’s rapid retreat from taxing Colombian imports.
- Even if short-lived, threatened tariffs have two consequences. Trump renegotiated NAFTA in their first term, and has now torn it up. Distrust may make negotiating trade deals more difficult. If the news cycle makes US consumers fearful about real income growth or job security, they may be less inclined to spend.
- The direct impact of the taxes does most damage to complex supply chains. A component in a US-made auto might cross the Mexican border a dozen times or more. A 25% tax on each Mexico-to-US flow quickly raises costs. Higher auto prices imply higher second-hand car prices, and higher auto insurance costs.
- US price increases will be rapid for some items, with reports of fuel companies announcing price increases already. There may be profit-led inflation if consumers expect price increases. China was able to reroute exports after Trump’s first-term taxes, but that is difficult for Canada and Mexico (some of China’s rerouted exports may have gone via those countries).
Explore more CIO Daily Updates
- How quickly will US inflation increase?
- ….not well
- ±….
- Economists’ ignorance is the problem
- United fronts
- “End the Fed”?
- US inflation pain a global gain?
- State controlled prices
- Tax facts
- Who believes the numbers?
- Insecurity
- Fiscal inefficiency
- Animal spirits measurement
- Tariffs start to show up
- Sort of stagflation?
- US rates – who decides?
- Changing the growth narrative
- A tale of two consumers
- Regional variations
- The rising price of drowning sorrows
- Cutting confidence more than spending
- Powell is not a chicken farmer
- When economics takes over
- Deflation and inflation
- Tax and retreat
- Taxes, spending, and rate cuts
- A disturbance in the force
- Tax attacks
- Taxes and data tampering
- Durable inflation?
- Markets start to fret
- US President Trump’s confusion
- Panem or Panglossian?
- Is an avocado tax credible?
- Breaking with the past
- Time to invest in the US?
- The risk of fantastic savings
- Nervousness about policy
- More taxes ahead
- Hiring and firing
- Keeping trade in the spotlight
- What US retreats tell us
- Protectionist, or pushover?
- The damage of data dependency
- The wider politics of price rises
- Time to plead for exceptions?
- What tariff retreats teach us
- The fear of fear
- Revising history
- Right person, right job, right time
- Trivialities and perceptions
- Retreat repeat
- Another fun year
- Time for more taxes
- Policy and policy uncertainty
- Rates and spending
- Efficiency versus GDP
- Reassuring signals?
- Tariff tales
- Setting rates
- Tariffs may not “solve” everything
- Threats and freezes
- Scripted versus unscripted
- Competitiveness considerations
- Will dollar strength magic away tariffs?
- Trade taxes and the US Treasury
- Benign inflation; now, what about growth?
- Shell shocked?
- Trade taxes and boiling frogs
- Buy before prices rise
- Does deregulation always boost growth?
- Dullness, and bias
- Ninety one days
- US rates paths
- Guardrails
- Taxes or tips?
- Laboring a point
- Here we go again
- A year of upsetting everyone
- Solid foundations, political threats
- Rates: Same story, different risks
- The end of the rate cut scramble
- Political noise, again
- Shuffling demand around
- Can food prices fall?
- Supporting consumers
- Real talk
- Taxing US consumers, cutting China’s taxes
- Taxing via tariffs
- The other side of the coin
- Employment without consensus
- Barnier falls
- Rule of law
- Après moi, le déluge?
- The importance of being the dollar
- Supply and demand, and inflation
- Budgets and bonds
- The good life
- Rate cuts and tax hikes
- Orthodoxy does not have influence