Daily update
Daily update
- 2025 is the best of times, and the worst of times; an epoch of belief, an epoch of incredulity. In an increasingly polarized world, people will cling to one side or the other—without recognizing that both sides can have a point. It is an economist’s role to impartially assess the economic consequences of politics, in clear and direct language. The likely result is that I will upset everyone this year.
- 2025 starts with developed economy consumers in a solid position—balance sheets are OK and real incomes are rising. Developed economy consumers dominate the global economy, and this suggests benign growth. The risk is political uncertainty.
- US President-elect Trump’s stated aim of aggressively taxing US consumers via tariffs is an example. Markets are not pricing in the inflation and growth consequences of policy pledges becoming reality, and assume dilution. The shift in immigration policy from Trump’s advisor Musk can be cited as a parallel—economic reality tempering political rhetoric.
- Investors’ assumption that economic reality will limit political extremes is evident elsewhere— China and Germany, for example. As polarization reduces the middle ground, it is inevitable that markets have to pick a side rather than a compromise. But if markets pick the wrong side, the economic fallout will be more dramatic.
Explore more CIO Daily Updates
- How quickly will US inflation increase?
- ….not well
- ….not well
- ±….
- Economists’ ignorance is the problem
- United fronts
- “End the Fed”?
- US inflation pain a global gain?
- State controlled prices
- Tax facts
- Who believes the numbers?
- Insecurity
- Fiscal inefficiency
- Animal spirits measurement
- Tariffs start to show up
- Sort of stagflation?
- US rates – who decides?
- Changing the growth narrative
- A tale of two consumers
- Regional variations
- The rising price of drowning sorrows
- Cutting confidence more than spending
- Powell is not a chicken farmer
- When economics takes over
- Deflation and inflation
- Tax and retreat
- Taxes, spending, and rate cuts
- A disturbance in the force
- Tax attacks
- Taxes and data tampering
- Durable inflation?
- Markets start to fret
- US President Trump’s confusion
- Panem or Panglossian?
- Is an avocado tax credible?
- Breaking with the past
- Time to invest in the US?
- The risk of fantastic savings
- Nervousness about policy
- More taxes ahead
- Hiring and firing
- Keeping trade in the spotlight
- What US retreats tell us
- Protectionist, or pushover?
- The damage of data dependency
- The wider politics of price rises
- Time to plead for exceptions?
- What tariff retreats teach us
- The fear of fear
- Revising history
- Right person, right job, right time
- Trivialities and perceptions
- Retreat repeat
- The Phantom Menace?
- Another fun year
- Time for more taxes
- Policy and policy uncertainty
- Rates and spending
- Efficiency versus GDP
- Reassuring signals?
- Tariff tales
- Setting rates
- Tariffs may not “solve” everything
- Threats and freezes
- Scripted versus unscripted
- Competitiveness considerations
- Will dollar strength magic away tariffs?
- Trade taxes and the US Treasury
- Benign inflation; now, what about growth?
- Shell shocked?
- Trade taxes and boiling frogs
- Buy before prices rise
- Does deregulation always boost growth?
- Dullness, and bias
- Ninety one days
- US rates paths
- Guardrails
- Taxes or tips?
- Laboring a point
- Here we go again
- Solid foundations, political threats
- Rates: Same story, different risks
- The end of the rate cut scramble
- Political noise, again
- Shuffling demand around
- Can food prices fall?
- Supporting consumers
- Real talk
- Taxing US consumers, cutting China’s taxes
- Taxing via tariffs
- The other side of the coin
- Employment without consensus
- Barnier falls
- Rule of law
- Après moi, le déluge?
- The importance of being the dollar
- Supply and demand, and inflation
- Budgets and bonds
- The good life
- Rate cuts and tax hikes