Daily update
Daily update
- In the UK, 11pm is when pubs close and the risk of sending incoherent text messages increases. In South Korea, 11pm was when President Yoon decided to declare martial law. Parliament rejected this, martial law was rescinded, the cabinet is threatening to resign en masse, and impeachment proceedings against Yoon start today. The Bank of Korea pledged unlimited liquidity to markets.
- The direct economic consequences of the political turmoil are limited—there may be some strike action in protest, perhaps. What matters to investors is the bigger picture. Martial law is not supposed to happen in advanced economies. In any country, at a time of dramatic structural economic change, intellectual freedom and the ability to challenge the status quo are vital to innovation and the rule of law is critical to investor confidence.
- France’s government faces its no-confidence motion today, with the left and the far right against the government. If the government does fall, a caretaker administration and continuation of the current fiscal arrangements seem the most likely outcome. In other words, inertia.
- The OECD publishes its Economic Outlook today. All economists’ views should be revered, but OECD economists have no special insight compared to other economists, and the views are often dated. The ۶Ƶ Year Ahead is at www.ubs.com/yearahead.
Explore more CIO Daily Updates
- How quickly will US inflation increase?
- ….not well
- ….not well
- ….not well
- ±….
- Economists’ ignorance is the problem
- United fronts
- “End the Fed”?
- US inflation pain a global gain?
- State controlled prices
- Tax facts
- Who believes the numbers?
- Insecurity
- Fiscal inefficiency
- Animal spirits measurement
- Tariffs start to show up
- Sort of stagflation?
- US rates – who decides?
- Changing the growth narrative
- A tale of two consumers
- Regional variations
- The rising price of drowning sorrows
- Cutting confidence more than spending
- Powell is not a chicken farmer
- When economics takes over
- Deflation and inflation
- Tax and retreat
- Taxes, spending, and rate cuts
- A disturbance in the force
- Tax attacks
- Taxes and data tampering
- Durable inflation?
- Markets start to fret
- US President Trump’s confusion
- Panem or Panglossian?
- Is an avocado tax credible?
- Breaking with the past
- Time to invest in the US?
- The risk of fantastic savings
- Nervousness about policy
- More taxes ahead
- Hiring and firing
- Keeping trade in the spotlight
- What US retreats tell us
- Protectionist, or pushover?
- The damage of data dependency
- The wider politics of price rises
- Time to plead for exceptions?
- What tariff retreats teach us
- The fear of fear
- Revising history
- Right person, right job, right time
- Trivialities and perceptions
- Retreat repeat
- The Phantom Menace?
- Another fun year
- Time for more taxes
- Policy and policy uncertainty
- Rates and spending
- Efficiency versus GDP
- Reassuring signals?
- Tariff tales
- Setting rates
- Tariffs may not “solve” everything
- Threats and freezes
- Scripted versus unscripted
- Competitiveness considerations
- Will dollar strength magic away tariffs?
- Trade taxes and the US Treasury
- Benign inflation; now, what about growth?
- Shell shocked?
- Trade taxes and boiling frogs
- Buy before prices rise
- Does deregulation always boost growth?
- Dullness, and bias
- Ninety one days
- US rates paths
- Guardrails
- Taxes or tips?
- Laboring a point
- Here we go again
- A year of upsetting everyone
- Solid foundations, political threats
- Rates: Same story, different risks
- The end of the rate cut scramble
- Political noise, again
- Shuffling demand around
- Can food prices fall?
- Supporting consumers
- Real talk
- Taxing US consumers, cutting China’s taxes
- Taxing via tariffs
- The other side of the coin
- Employment without consensus
- Barnier falls
- Après moi, le déluge?
- The importance of being the dollar
- Supply and demand, and inflation
- Budgets and bonds
- The good life