The free rider problem: economics and climate action
Countries are not incentivized to minimize their climate change mitigation efforts when they can free ride on the efforts of others instead.
header.search.error
Countries are not incentivized to minimize their climate change mitigation efforts when they can free ride on the efforts of others instead.
Learn how the free rider problem impacts collective action across various social science fields including climate action聽
What is a free rider?
A free rider is someone who benefits from a collective good or resource without contributing their fair share towards its provision. In other words, they receive the benefits of a group or society's actions or resources without contributing to the cost or effort involved.
What is the 鈥淔ree Rider Problem鈥?
Free riding in the economy describes a market failure that occurs when those who benefit from resources, goods, or services do not contribute to the costs. As a result, others may contribute less, knowing that there are individuals who free ride.
What are some examples of the Free Rider Problem?
Wikipedia is certainly one of the best examples of the free rider problem. A platform that gives people around the world knowledge for free whose annual call for donations is clicked away by many. Why pay for something when you can have it for free?
How is the Free Rider Problem connected to climate change?
The free rider problem can be applied to many questions. In recent years, it has received particular attention in the debate about climate change. Numerous economists describe free riding as one of the main difficulties in tackling the problem.
鈥淚n the end, each country would like the other country to put in the effort to reduce emissions,鈥 explains Jean Tirole. 鈥淚f France reduces emissions, it鈥檚 going to get only a small fraction of the benefit, but it鈥檚 going to bare 100 percent of the costs.鈥
My country first鈥 is a big slogan in almost every country nowadays. That鈥檚 a difficulty.
Given the urgent need for climate protection, there doesn鈥檛 seem to be a good reason why France, or any other country, wouldn鈥檛 want to address the problem immediately, without considering the costs. But when viewed through the eyes of an economist, who knows well that incentives take precedence, the problem becomes clear.
The benefits of reducing emissions in a country will largely be felt outside of its own borders. As a result, countries that act in their own self-interest are incentivized to minimize their mitigation efforts and to free ride on the efforts of other countries.
鈥溾楳y country first鈥 is a big slogan in almost every country nowadays,鈥 says Tirole. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 a difficulty. We all want others to do the job.鈥
How has the world come closer together in recent decades?
Christopher Pissarides explains how the world has come closer together in recent decades. Trade liberalization, globalization, the establishment of multinational institutions such as the EU are all examples of this.
鈥淭hat鈥檚 the gradual elimination of borders,鈥 says Pissarides. 鈥淗uman beings still don鈥檛 look at the whole earth as one that鈥檚 belonging to all of them, but the environment is gradually bringing them together. Hopefully, one day we鈥檒l reach the point where people are less territorial. Economic borders will have to fall.鈥
Economic borders will have to fall.
Get the latest Nobel Perspectives updates delivered to you.
Get the latest Nobel Perspectives updates delivered to you.