ÃÛ¶¹ÊÓƵ

Our onshore China fixed income position is in central government bonds (CGBs) and policy bank bonds (PBBs) so we are quite cautious with the position that we take since these are some of the most liquid parts of the onshore China bond market.

FTSE Russell is the third major index provider to include onshore China bonds in their indices. It is not such a significant step on its own, but it continues the trend of index inclusion and attracts flow from international investors, which we expect to see play out in the coming years.

We hold a constructive view on RMB appreciation. Hence, we no longer hedge our positions and we are comfortable with the RMB positions gained through our onshore exposures.

We have a large position in the China A share space, but we see that the China H space looks attractive too. China A shares have rallied quite a lot, opening up quite a premium vs. the China H share market. We believe there is potential for China H shares to rise in the coming months and then close the premium gap.

Generally, we have a preference for USD credits over Chinese onshore corporate bonds, and we prefer high yield over investment grade because we still like the fundamentals in the space and the market has priced in a higher implied default risk, and particularly in the property space where we hold companies that have stronger balance sheet and solid cash flows.

Default cycles are part of the maturing China onshore bond market and are in a longer term perspective a healthy development for pricing and stability.

In a historical perspective, default cycles are nothing new. The defaults seen recently have been in the local state-owned enterprise space, where we have seen defaults in local SOEs since 2014 and an uptick in the cycle throughout 2015-2017, indicating a gradual shift towards a more reflective market pricing.

Most importantly, within the onshore bond space for our China Allocation Opportunity strategy, we only hold rates bonds - CGBs and PBBs - which are government-backed and seen as safe assets.

China is clearly on a strong V-shaped recovery track and we expect the economy to return to on-trend growth in the next 6 to 12 months.

We have a risk on mode with a long position in equities and prefer credits over government bonds.

We have increased our credits exposure by funding out from our onshore government bonds while we still hold a meaningful amount to balance risk.

We have a preference on?high yield over investment grade considering the attractive yield and implied default risk. We hold a constructive view on RMB appreciation and we are comfortable with the RMB positions gained through our onshore exposures.

Unlike President Trump, Biden may choose to build multilateral coalitions with American allies to address China on matters pertaining to trade, technology, human rights, and the environment.

All in all, we take a view that, while the geopolitical risk will likely linger in the background, a Biden administration would be supportive to Chinese risk assets in the shorter term.

In addition to active bets between equity and bonds, we emphasis the importance of allocating capital between the onshore and offshore assets to benefit from different catalysts and investor behavior.