ÃÛ¶¹ÊÓƵ

As a species, we are superb at making assumptions. But how often do we actually check ourselves? And, more importantly, what are the repercussions when we fail to do so?

It's a common notion – everywhere from the streets of Chicago to far away countries classified as developing. And it's an adage as old as colonialization (and just as troubling) – that those living in poverty are not as capable of making economically sound decisions. And therefore, giving funds directly to them is ineffective.

In order to make real progress, we're reevaluating our preconceptions.

Today, cash counts for less than 10 percent of humanitarian aid.¹ÌýAnd this means that it's the providers of aid who decide what poor people need most. A non-profit organization we partner with is questioning whether this approach really helps lift people out of poverty for good.

has explored sending money (usually instalments totaling ~USD 1,000 – approximately a year of income) directly to people living in extreme poverty. They send the money unconditionally, then record the results.

GiveDirectly's fundamental premise is quite simple – that people living in poverty know their own needs better than anyone else. And when given cash transfers, they can, and do, change their futures positively.

GiveDirectly does their homework to make sure transfers get to those who need them.

They begin by using public data to locate extremely poor families and then send staff door to door for enrollment. They use criteria that varies by region to identify the poorest – including looking at housing materials to identify the poorest families.

Independent checks (background and data consistency checks, image verification, etc.) help ensure recipients are eligible and did not pay bribes.

After an electronic transfer, recipients receive an SMS and can then withdraw cash at a mobile money agent. Finally, each recipient receives a call to verify the transfer was received and GiveDirectly staff often follow up in person.