header.search.error
Institutional investors choose convertible bonds because of the compelling risk-adjusted performance the asset class has delivered over the long term.
It is generally assumed that the end of the ongoing rate hike cycle in key developed markets is either already behind us or not too far off. With this in mind, many investors ask themselves how to optimally position their portfolios for the new environment. We looked in the rearview mirror to examine how convertible bonds performed during such periods in the past. Since 1994 (when the Refinitiv convertible bond indices were launched), we identified four such cycles prior to the current one. The US Federal Funds target rate was used as our reference point. The following four dates correspond to the last rate hikes from the Fed during those cycles: February 1, 1995; May 16, 2000; June 29, 2006; and December 19, 2018. On some occasions, rates started retracing their earlier moves relatively quickly, while in others (such as in 2006) it took longer for rates to start declining again. In the interest of consistency, we looked at fixed time horizons following the end of a rate hike cycle, starting with six months as shown in the graph below.
Chart 1: Development of the federal funds target rate (mid point) and the period following the day of the last hike
Analyzing convertible bond performance using the Refinitiv Global Bond Index and subindices
As proxies for convertible bond performance, we used the Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond Index (Global CBs) together with its subindices Global Focus, which represent the balanced/convex subsegment as well as the investment-grade (IG) subsegment, all in USD hedged.
Strong short-term performance aligned with expectations
With the caveat that we only have four observation periods to work with, convertible bonds tend to perform well in absolute terms. In a relative context, the performance of CBs was somewhere between that of equities and bonds. Thus, we can conclude that in the short term, convertible bonds behave broadly as expected in a bond/equity paradigm.
End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | Period 1 | Period 1 | Period 2 | Period 2 | Period 3 | Period 3 | Period 4 | Period 4 | Average | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | Global CBs | Period 1 | 12.44% | Period 2 | -4.11% | Period 3 | 10.90% | Period 4 | 10.48% | Average | 7.43% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | Global Focus CBs | Period 1 | 12.12% | Period 2 | -0.78% | Period 3 | 11.44% | Period 4 | 7.14% | Average | 7.48% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | Global IG CBs | Period 1 | 13.05% | Period 2 | -3.91% | Period 3 | 9.74% | Period 4 | 6.11% | Average | 6.25% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | Global Equities | Period 1 | 16.36% | Period 2 | -8.40% | Period 3 | 15.02% | Period 4 | 15.54% | Average | 9.63% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +6 Months Performance | Global Bonds | Period 1 | 8.92% | Period 2 | 5.36% | Period 3 | 4.51% | Period 4 | 5.90% | Average | 6.17% |
Long-term perspective reveals favorable characteristics of convertible bonds
What is even more interesting, however, is how the results change if we expand the observation period beyond the rather short six-month time horizon. What we find is that longer observation periods tend to favor convertible bonds. If, for example, a 24-month period is used, the results look as follows:
End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | Period 1 | Period 1 | Period 2 | Period 2 | Period 3 | Period 3 | Period 4 | Period 4 | Average | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | Global CBs | Period 1 | 37.57% | Period 2 | -10.96% | Period 3 | 11.58% | Period 4 | 55.57% | Average | 23.44% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | Global Focus CBs | Period 1 | 37.52% | Period 2 | -9.45% | Period 3 | 10.54% | Period 4 | 37.48% | Average | 19.02% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | Global IG CBs | Period 1 | 36.73% | Period 2 | -7.50% | Period 3 | 9.66% | Period 4 | 22.07% | Average | 15.24% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | Global Equities | Period 1 | 40.76% | Period 2 | -26.24% | Period 3 | 11.79% | Period 4 | 46.01% | Average | 18.08% |
End of Fed Hike Cycle +24 Months Performance | Global Bonds | Period 1 | 25.17% | Period 2 | 17.11% | Period 3 | 10.34% | Period 4 | 14.26% | Average | 16.72% |
Global convertible bonds in particular but also to a large degree the global focus subsegment outshine both equities and bonds, on average. Of course, a substantial portion of that relative outperformance is attributable to 2020, which was an exceptionally strong year by all standards. One could also argue that four observation periods represent mere anecdotal evidence and not empirical evidence. Yet, we find the results encouraging and believe they are worth highlighting. They also deserve additional monitoring and analysis in our view.
An asset class to keep on the radar
It is still too early to say whether the end of the current rate hike cycle has already been completed or whether we still have one or two hikes ahead of us. In either scenario, however, the inflection point in the direction of interest rates and – with it – the period when convertible bonds start asserting themselves should not be too far ahead in the future.